By MARSHA MERCER
It’s not easy to summarize a year in a single word,
especially a year as tumultuous and polarized as this one.
Maybe that’s why lexicographers’ choices for the Word
of the Year 2017 all have a political hue.
Collins Dictionary chose one of President Donald
Trump’s favorites -- “fake news” -- as its word for 2017. Definition: “false, often sensational, information disseminated
under the guise of news.”
Merriam-Webster picked “feminism.” You’d think
everybody would know it means “the theory of the political, economic and social
equality of the sexes” and “organized activity on behalf of women’s rights and
interests.”
But when Merriam-Webster analyzed “lookups” of words
online to gauge public interest, feminism was a top lookup of the year, first
spiking after the Women’s March on Washington in January. As discussions of
feminism evolved with the news, interest in the word kept spiking, the
dictionary said.
Dictionary.com went for “complicit” after lookups
surged following a Saturday Night Live parody commercial featuring Scarlett
Johansson as a sultry Ivanka Trump. The fake ad was for “Complicit,” “the
fragrance for the woman who could stop all this . . . but won’t.”
Lookups of complicit surged
again after Trump said she didn’t know what it meant to be complicit.
The esteemed Oxford Dictionaries chose “youthquake,” a
1965 creation repurposed to reflect the significant influence of young voters
in the UK’s snap election last June.
“It is a rare political word that sounds a hopeful
note,” said Casper Grathwohl, president of the dictionaries of the Oxford
University Press, although he acknowledged: “It’s true that it’s yet to land
firmly on American soil but strong evidence in the UK calls it out as a word on
the move.”
Talking about words on the move, where’s covfefe when
we need it?
Covfefe epitomized President Donald Trump and his tweet
machine. It’s a made-up word he used in a truncated tweet a little after
midnight on May 31: “Despite the constant negative press covfefe”
The tweet was later deleted, but then-Press Secretary
Sean Spicer, in an explanation worthy of the Alice in Wonderland School of
Spin, told reporters, “The president and a small group of people know exactly
what he meant.”
Instead of trying to settle on one Word of the Year, perhaps
we should think of 2017 as the Year of Words. Plural.
No president ever word-bombed the nation the way Trump
does, instantly sharing his mood swings with the masses.
Trump weaponized words, but he wasn’t the only one. North
Korea President Kim Jong Un must have been thumbing through an old thesaurus
when he called Trump “a mentally deranged U.S. dotard.” A dotard is someone
who’s elderly and senile.
The year began with Trump’s dystopian vision of
America. Inaugural addresses typically play to the nation’s hopes and dreams; his
stoked fears with words like “carnage.”
The new administration delivered “alternative facts,” White
House aide Kellyanne Conway’s infelicitous phrase for Spicer’s lies about the size
of the crowd at the inauguration.
The year is ending with the administration denying a Washington
Post report that the Department of Health and Human Services had banned the
Centers for Disease Control from using seven words in its 2019 budget request.
The words are: diversity,
entitlement, evidence-based, fetus, science-based,
transgender and vulnerable.
HHS strenuously denied the prohibition, and CDC
Director Brenda Fitzgerald tweeted, “I want to assure you there are no banned
words at CDC.”
An
analysis by Science Insider, though, found the words already had been used far
less in CDC’s 2018 budget request earlier this year than in the three previous Obama
CDC requests.
The New York Times subsequently reported it wasn’t a
ban so much as a recommendation to avoid language that might slow or derail approval
of the budget by Republicans. So it appears red-flag words were banned as a political
strategy.
A firestorm ensued, of course, as free speech still
matters.
The American Dialect Society, a group of linguists and
other academics, will vote for its Word of the Year Jan. 5.
It would be nice to think its word describing this
rancorous year could be hopeful for the future.
But that’s unlikely. Its choice last year was more
prophetic than anyone thought. Remember “dumpster fire”?
©2017 Marsha Mercer. All rights reserved.
30
No comments:
Post a Comment