By
MARSHA MERCER
Common
sense is the mantra of the moment in the nation’s capital.
The
other day, Republican House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio accused Democratic
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada of “making a deceitful and cynical
attempt to derail the House’s common-sense solution” on dealing with the border
crisis.
Almost every group from President Obama
and proponents of gun control to those who think fast-food restaurants
shouldn’t have to list their calorie counts seek support by appealing to “common
sense.”
But as members of Congress -- Democrat
or Republican – present their legislative proposals as common sense, likely as
not an opposing Republican or Democrat quickly will warn that the proposal is
anything but.
Common sense is something we used to
assume all Americans have. Since Thomas Paine published his famous “Common
Sense” pamphlet in January 1776 and sparked a revolution, we’ve been enamored
of plain talk and level-headedness.
That paragon of American inventiveness
Thomas Alva Edison said the three great essentials to achieving anything
worthwhile are, first, hard work; second, stick-to-itiveness; third, common
sense.
Last Wednesday, Rep. Bennie G. Thompson,
D-Miss., and Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., introduced a bill to “restore common sense
to the classification and security system.”
Most people didn’t know that more than 5
million people hold security clearances and that the system is cumbersome,
costly and potentially intrusive. Call in common sense reform!
In 2010, the Labor Department’s
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) introduced the first new
rules in nearly 40 years for heavy equipment operators. The White House called
the rules a “common sense approach to cranes, derricks and the safety of
American construction workers.” After complaints, OSHA later agreed to delay
the certification period for operators until 2017.
Many people thought that the time for
“common sense” gun control had come after the school massacre in Newtown,
Conn., in 2012. And yet, the proposal to require background checks for all gun
sales has languished on Capitol Hill.
On July 10 in Austin, Tex., President
Obama reviewed his campaign-year agenda -- reforming immigration policy,
expanding early-childhood education and launching bridge and highway
construction projects.
“They are commonsense things,” he said.
“They’re not that radical. We know it’s what we should be doing. And what
drives me nuts – and I know drives you nuts – is Washington isn’t doing it.”
The president put his finger on
something. Just because you tie your idea to the wings of the bird of common
sense doesn’t mean it will fly. Most so-called common sense proposals never get
off the ground.
Which brings us to one word that’s
rarely mentioned in connection with common sense: compromise. Most people would
agree that compromise is part of common sense, but it’s in short supply in the
capital.
Perhaps we all should take a lesson from Andre
Davis, senior judge in the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in
Richmond. wrote
The court upheld in the July 22 King v.
Burwell decision tax credit subsidies for people who buy health insurance on
federally-run health exchanges through the Affordable Care Act. At issue:
whether Congress had intended to limit subsidies to people in states that ran
their own exchanges, excluding states where the exchanges are run by the
federal government.
Davis wrote in his concurring opinion:
“If I ask for pizza from Pizza Hut for
lunch but clarify that I would be fine with a pizza from Domino’s, and I then
specify that I want ham and pepperoni on my pizza from Pizza Hut, (and) my
friend who returns from Domino’s with a ham and pepperoni pizza (she) has still
complied with a literal construction of my lunch order.
“That
is this case.”
There’s common sense in action.
30
©2014
Marsha Mercer. All rights reserved.
Nice post.A valuable information here.Thanks for sharing with us. Construction projects
ReplyDelete