By MARSHA MERCER
We’ll eventually find out what the IRS employees in Cincinnati
thought they were doing when they subjected tea party groups to special
scrutiny. We already know that they did accomplish one thing, unintentionally. They
breathed new life into the tea party movement.
That irony will haunt Democrats and President Barack Obama in the 2014
elections. It’s an old, but good, lesson for anyone involved in government:
Avoid even the appearance of a partisan fishing expedition, especially if
you’re in the federal agency most Americans fear and hate most.
As of now, it seems that a few overworked, misguided IRS employees
in Cincinnati, whose job it was to make sure groups applying for tax-exempt
status met certain legal criteria, used a shorthand guide to check groups. This
was a Be On the Look Out, or BOLO, system to give special scrutiny to groups
that had tea party, patriot or 9/12 in their names.
Wrong, wrong, wrong. The IRS needs to be scrupulously nonpartisan.
Still, imagine that fewer than 200 overworked employees faced more than 70,000
requests for non-profit status a year. They might want to find a quick way to assess
who was eligible.
Still, going after conservatives wasn’t the solution. Even worse,
the IRS’ boss said to stop using the criteria but the employees apparently didn’t
stop, according to the Treasury Department Inspector General report. Groups
that may have been totally legitimate were subjected to ridiculous reporting
requirements. At least one was asked which books its
leaders were reading.
Watchdog
groups have long warned that some groups, conservative and liberal, were
abusing the tax-exempt privilege. Congress needs to clarify just how much
political activity is allowed.
After last November’s elections, many analysts wrote off the tea
party movement. Several tea party-endorsed Senate candidates washed out, and Michele
Bachmann, the tea party darling and victor in the Iowa Republican presidential
caucuses, barely won re-election to her House seat in Minnesota.
“Could
there potentially be political implications regarding health care — access to
health care, denial of health care — will that happen based upon a person’s
political beliefs or their religiously-held beliefs?” Bachmann asked.
She
conceded that these questions would have been considered “out of bounds a week
ago,” but with the IRS enforcing the penalty for those who refuse to purchase
insurance in 2014, she said, it’s “more than reasonable and more than fair” for
Americans to ask.
Well,
no, it’s neither reasonable nor fair. It’s far-fetched, to put it politely. But
this is what happens when an administration runs off the rails.
Don’t
get me wrong. The IRS must be above reproach. People must trust that government
actions are nonpartisan. Employees reviewing applications for tax-exempt status
should never single out groups with partisan-sounding names for intense review,
delaying processing. It was “inappropriate,” the Treasury Department Inspector
General said. And it was tone deaf. The office that conducted the reviews “did
not consider the public perception of using politically sensitive criteria when
identifying these cases,” the inspector general said in his report.
The
IRS did not deny even one request for tax-exempt status from these groups.
Still, the IRS story was one of
three that together were damning for President Barack Obama, who promised
transparency and honesty.
Besides the IRS targeting, the State Department and other agencies
offered confusing explanations about what happened in the attack last year on
the mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed four American diplomats.
Plus, the
Justice Department secretly seized two months of telephone records of reporters
and editors of the Associated Press.
At his news conference Thursday, Obama said he "did
not know anything" about an IRS inspector general's report on political
targeting prior to media reports. The reporter had asked, though, whether
anyone at the White House knew about the targeting. We will know more later.
Michele
Bachmann will make sure about that.
©
Marsha Mercer 2013. All rights reserved.
Ms. Mercer makes excellent points about the IRS and other scandels plagueing the Obama adiministration.. However, one should not underestimate the possibility that liberal IRS employees could and would treat conseratives seeking health care in a prejudiced way. Eternal vigilance is necessary to make sure it doesn't happen. Good work, Ms. Mercer.
ReplyDelete